<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>The Inquisitr - Latest Comments in Tweetdeck vs Twhirl: It&amp;#8217;s a very hard call</title><link>http://inquisitr.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://inquisitr.disqus.com/tweetdeck_vs_twhirl_it8217s_a_very_hard_call/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 09:13:13 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Tweetdeck vs Twhirl: It&amp;#8217;s a very hard call</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/18832/tweetdeck-vs-twhirl-its-a-very-hard-call/#comment-7674180</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Support for multiple Twitter accounts cant be very far away in Tweet deck.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As far as archive of your own messages, simply set up a search filter in its own column in TweetDeck for your user name (without the @ incase people forget to add it) then any tweet and reply to your tweet will show up in its own column. I have a similar filter set up for our business URL = instant notification of conversations around your business/brand.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So that really only leaves customising the audio notifications, which is a tiny addition that TweetDeck could (will) easily add.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;TweetDeck FTW!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 09:13:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tweetdeck vs Twhirl: It&amp;#8217;s a very hard call</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/18832/tweetdeck-vs-twhirl-its-a-very-hard-call/#comment-7380699</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As you stated, if you have multiple accounts, Twhirl is the winner. That point should be stressed. Tweetdeck would be a massive mess with multiple accounts in it's current incarnation. I personally love Twhirl's Black Magic theme. Twhirl is compact, it gives me alerts when I need them. It gives me a "fly in" of my most recent tweets, replies and DM'S, then disappears so that I can continue working. I love Twhirl. Just one gyrlz opinion.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NowVoyager</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 14:56:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tweetdeck vs Twhirl: It&amp;#8217;s a very hard call</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/18832/tweetdeck-vs-twhirl-its-a-very-hard-call/#comment-6701134</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great review! I like and use both TweetDeck and Thwirl for different reasons. I posted on it here: &lt;a href="http://preview.tinyurl.com/c9zarg" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://preview.tinyurl.com/c9zarg"&gt;http://preview.tinyurl.com/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Evans</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:21:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tweetdeck vs Twhirl: It&amp;#8217;s a very hard call</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/18832/tweetdeck-vs-twhirl-its-a-very-hard-call/#comment-6698493</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Twhirl's Seesmic capability makes it more than just a twitter client.&lt;br&gt;It can do video messages and twitter messages.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Tweetdeck cannot.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If Seesmic ever goes mainstream, as twitter did once it was liberated from the browser, Tweetdeck will be a distant memory.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rick Martin</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 08:05:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tweetdeck vs Twhirl: It&amp;#8217;s a very hard call</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/18832/tweetdeck-vs-twhirl-its-a-very-hard-call/#comment-6661773</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Maybe it's' just my system but TweetDeck seems to take a ton of memory (89mb just after starting up the client).  It has a nice UI and all but that's a serious drag for systems with limited resources...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TweetDeck</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:20:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tweetdeck vs Twhirl: It&amp;#8217;s a very hard call</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/18832/tweetdeck-vs-twhirl-its-a-very-hard-call/#comment-6659520</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I just started using both Tweetdeck and Twhirl, and both have advantages and disadvantages. I use the former for its groups and to check my replies. The latter posts to &lt;a href="http://ping.fm/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://ping.fm/"&gt;http://ping.fm/&lt;/a&gt; and allows me to follow FriendFeed. Before this I was using TwitterFox which I just found irritating. In my browser I use, TwitBar, PowerTwitter and TwitKit.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I did find that running them both means I hit the API rate limit quite fast, which means to tweaking with the settings. And as I don't check the follow feed in Tweetdeck I set the reply and dm to update more often than the follow feed, and the other way around in Twhirl.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As I said I will probably not choose, I like to use the best features of all the applications mentioned in this comment.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniël W. Crompton (webhat)</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:51:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tweetdeck vs Twhirl: It&amp;#8217;s a very hard call</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/18832/tweetdeck-vs-twhirl-its-a-very-hard-call/#comment-6658095</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If all I wanted to do is Tweet (or if I followed about 1500 users)...then TweetDeck would be great!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately, I do occasionally have to work...and Twhirl affords a much nicer form-factor.  It quietly sits in the BG or sits in it's transparent state on my desktop.  Much less obtrusive.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dave powell</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:54:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tweetdeck vs Twhirl: It&amp;#8217;s a very hard call</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/18832/tweetdeck-vs-twhirl-its-a-very-hard-call/#comment-6656849</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm using TweetDeck and really liking it for personal use. I only have one account and don't follow a TON of people. I really love having twitscoop as well, great feature.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I havn't used Twhirl so I can't comment on it but by the graphic shown the looks are rather similar aren't they?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">matt john</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:00:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tweetdeck vs Twhirl: It&amp;#8217;s a very hard call</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/18832/tweetdeck-vs-twhirl-its-a-very-hard-call/#comment-6652814</link><description>&lt;p&gt; Thanks, this article saved a lot of time looking at both programs  and gave me more time to Tweet about my art.&lt;br&gt;JKS&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">figstreetstudio</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 06:59:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tweetdeck vs Twhirl: It&amp;#8217;s a very hard call</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/18832/tweetdeck-vs-twhirl-its-a-very-hard-call/#comment-6652801</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It was a tough call, but in the end I settled on the smaller simplicity of Twhirl.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PeterS</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 06:57:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tweetdeck vs Twhirl: It&amp;#8217;s a very hard call</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/18832/tweetdeck-vs-twhirl-its-a-very-hard-call/#comment-6647504</link><description>&lt;p&gt;thank you Duncan for this post. We're working hard. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Loic Le Meur</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 03:34:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tweetdeck vs Twhirl: It&amp;#8217;s a very hard call</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/18832/tweetdeck-vs-twhirl-its-a-very-hard-call/#comment-6633817</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I prefer Tweetdeck personally, but I am also using Twhirl to work with FriendFeed and &lt;a href="http://Identi.ca" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Identi.ca"&gt;Identi.ca&lt;/a&gt;. I am new to Twhirl, so just exploring its features. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:43:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tweetdeck vs Twhirl: It&amp;#8217;s a very hard call</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/18832/tweetdeck-vs-twhirl-its-a-very-hard-call/#comment-6631085</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Odd I've always found Twhirl to be a good looking client, namely the black magic theme (the default one is terrible though). Even though I got even screen space on the desktop I near liked tweetdeck taking up all the space it does and the single window view comes off as terrible to me. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Boredcollegekid</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:30:47 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>