<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>The Inquisitr - Latest Comments in TechCrunch writing caught fibbing about startup numbers</title><link>http://inquisitr.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://inquisitr.disqus.com/techcrunch_writing_caught_fibbing_about_startup_numbers/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 18:28:17 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: TechCrunch writing caught fibbing about startup numbers</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/30142/techcrunch-writing-caught-fibbing-about-startup-numbers/#comment-13294894</link><description>&lt;p&gt;there's a big difference between 10,000 pageviews and 10,000 users. If you don't consider this article by the Inquisitr fair, then there is no hope for you. I would mind your language too, throwing around the word retard doesn't give you much credence.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ouch</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 18:28:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TechCrunch writing caught fibbing about startup numbers</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/30142/techcrunch-writing-caught-fibbing-about-startup-numbers/#comment-13274677</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Mommy?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That's just retarded.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The updated posts on other sites are much more fair.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JolieODell</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 11:34:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TechCrunch writing caught fibbing about startup numbers</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/30142/techcrunch-writing-caught-fibbing-about-startup-numbers/#comment-13266430</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Mark, that isn't totally impossible, but we're not talking 10k versus 8k or 7k.  We're talking 10k versus 400.  That's not explainable as anything but number inflation.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vinny</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 08:25:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TechCrunch writing caught fibbing about startup numbers</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/30142/techcrunch-writing-caught-fibbing-about-startup-numbers/#comment-13248891</link><description>&lt;p&gt;SiliconANGLE recently switched to a Wordpress MU install, due mainly to the fact that the standard wordpress isn't built to accommodate a growing community of 80+ contributors very well.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;One of the first things that started happening (started just this week, actually) was that sploggers got a hold of us and started creating fake accounts.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It took me a couple of days to first of all realize what was going on (they let the accounts incubate a few days before they start splogging and spamming users, usually with separate accounts) ... and then another day or so to research the best ways to prevent it from happening.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I *suppose* it's possible that at the time when Daniel gave out that number, his user count was inflated by sploggers (10k isn't an unreasonable number if you count sploggers - it's all automated), and then later got a handle on what was going on, but didn't want to come out and revise the number and look bad.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark 'Rizzn' Hopkins</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 01:36:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TechCrunch writing caught fibbing about startup numbers</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/30142/techcrunch-writing-caught-fibbing-about-startup-numbers/#comment-13247809</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, mommy Brusilovsky, these numbers are verified. Big bad hackers have proof that your little boy was caught with his nose growing 10,000 feet long: &lt;a href="http://netnewsdaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/ss6.jpg" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://netnewsdaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/ss6.jpg"&gt;http://netnewsdaily.com/wp-...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ouch</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 00:49:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TechCrunch writing caught fibbing about startup numbers</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/30142/techcrunch-writing-caught-fibbing-about-startup-numbers/#comment-13194645</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Are we sure that those numbers can be verified? And are subscriber and registered WP users the same thing?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The site that originally reported this nonsense did a terrible job of it, and it's more vindictive than investigative, in the opinion of a lot of tech bloggers I know.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JolieODell</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 03:16:43 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>