<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>The Inquisitr - Latest Comments in TechCrunch sued by Earthcomber, ethical questions</title><link>http://inquisitr.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 13:28:10 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: TechCrunch sued by Earthcomber, ethical questions</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/4844/techcrunch-sued-by-earthcomber-ethical-questions/#comment-6876229</link><description>LOFL</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">christan singles</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 13:28:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TechCrunch sued by Earthcomber, ethical questions</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/4844/techcrunch-sued-by-earthcomber-ethical-questions/#comment-3593817</link><description>LOFL&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Who the hell uses or takes ANY notice of personratings?! Some of you tech boys need to live in the real world</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scott</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 11:44:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TechCrunch sued by Earthcomber, ethical questions</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/4844/techcrunch-sued-by-earthcomber-ethical-questions/#comment-2966866</link><description>Earhcomber CEO Jim Brady has really taken a hit in the 'Smart' category. His ratings in other areas aren't looking steller either: &lt;a href="http://www.personratings.com/rating/Jim/Brady/139" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.personratings.com/rating/Jim/Brady/139&lt;/a&gt;    Compare that to Mike Arrington's current ratings - &lt;a href="http://www.personratings.com/name/Michael/Arrington/88" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.personratings.com/name/Michael/Arrin...&lt;/a&gt; - and you get some idea of where public opinion is at.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Carl Pierce</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 14:40:36 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>