<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>The Inquisitr - Latest Comments in Tech blogging is only as boring as the feeds you read</title><link>http://inquisitr.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://inquisitr.disqus.com/tech_blogging_is_only_as_boring_as_the_feeds_you_read_41/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 21:42:05 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Tech blogging is only as boring as the feeds you read</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/1824/tech-blogging-is-only-as-boring-as-the-feeds-you-read/#comment-962238</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think the mix here is great. It has me reading a few things I wouldn't have known otherwise, and as long as they stay interesting and in the minority, I think it's a nice spice.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gs</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 21:42:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tech blogging is only as boring as the feeds you read</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/1824/tech-blogging-is-only-as-boring-as-the-feeds-you-read/#comment-953862</link><description>&lt;p&gt;more ..  because i care :-)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;mr. riley, too much stuff on one site, for inquisitr, in my opinion&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;i was in an art show a couple of weeks ago in a five star hotel in bangalore, and it was combined with a jewelry show ... result, a split audience, the jewelry lovers confused by the art, the art lovers confused by the jewelry, nobody from either genre sold anything ...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;have you thought of doing this in two or three different sites?  guess we could call that denton-style, as opposed to huffingtonpost-style, though that is primarily politics and not quite so confusing until you scroll down the page ...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;i like your voice, and come here to read you, i have a more narrow interest area than what is available here, but i often cannot find you easily, or prominently ... so i actually follow you on friendfeed more than your bread and butter site!&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gregorylent</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 02:03:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tech blogging is only as boring as the feeds you read</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/1824/tech-blogging-is-only-as-boring-as-the-feeds-you-read/#comment-953825</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i think we need more context reporting ...  from someone who understands where all the new stuff is going, what it is for, how it fits into a larger human history than just today's techmeme stats&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;i read it for the voice, more than the content anyway .. i like the duncan and louis and robert and michael voices that permeate the active sites,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;me-too is boring, the personal much less so ...  heck on a slow news day i would rather read about the frustrated tech news sleuth in action than any thing that he/she might find&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gregorylent</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 01:54:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tech blogging is only as boring as the feeds you read</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/1824/tech-blogging-is-only-as-boring-as-the-feeds-you-read/#comment-953464</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the kind words Duncan - from you they are high praise indeed and I truly appreciate it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">StevenHodson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 00:11:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tech blogging is only as boring as the feeds you read</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/1824/tech-blogging-is-only-as-boring-as-the-feeds-you-read/#comment-953197</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Louis, I probably should have mentioned RSSMeme and ReadBurner as well, two great ways of finding fresh content. I had Robert's feed, just added yours. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Duncan Riley</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 23:16:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tech blogging is only as boring as the feeds you read</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/1824/tech-blogging-is-only-as-boring-as-the-feeds-you-read/#comment-953193</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is just the evolution of the field. Its clear that it is easier to be another echo. It takes a lot more work to be original and when you find something good, do your part to lend attention to it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Risley</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 23:15:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tech blogging is only as boring as the feeds you read</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/1824/tech-blogging-is-only-as-boring-as-the-feeds-you-read/#comment-953158</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Duncan, it's clear we agree. I wish there was more focus on new reporting and new angles or new data, rather than making sure every big blog covered a single story. But I don't think Tech blogging is in trouble. It's fun! And there are a lot of new voices out there contributing. Beyond FriendFeed, some good options are reading RSSMeme and ReadBurner or individual shared link blogs like mine or Robert's.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Mine: &lt;a href="http://www.google.com/reader/shared/05763917848110205585" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.google.com/reader/shared/05763917848110205585"&gt;http://www.google.com/reade...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;Scoble's: &lt;a href="http://www.google.com/reader/shared/14480565058256660224" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.google.com/reader/shared/14480565058256660224"&gt;http://www.google.com/reade...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Louis Gray</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 23:08:28 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>