<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>The Inquisitr - Latest Comments in Surprise! The memory issues are back in Firefox</title><link>http://inquisitr.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 19:48:16 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Surprise! The memory issues are back in Firefox</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/8261/surprise-the-memory-issues-are-back-in-firefox/#comment-3904950</link><description>Since I am on Mac I really learned to live without all the plugins I used before and Webkit became my weapon of choice, except when doing dev work.&lt;br&gt;The slick, no thrills approach even made Chrome my main browser on Windows. Admitted, I miss the occasional plugin, but not that much either.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">franky</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 19:48:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Surprise! The memory issues are back in Firefox</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/8261/surprise-the-memory-issues-are-back-in-firefox/#comment-3866565</link><description>I am running Windows FireFox too and have been experiencing more crashes with 3.0.4 than I have ever had in my entire relationship with Firefox.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ed</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 15:50:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Surprise! The memory issues are back in Firefox</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/8261/surprise-the-memory-issues-are-back-in-firefox/#comment-3794585</link><description>Stopped using FF a long time ago because of the bloatedness of this browser. With growing number of very capable alternatives FF team need to sort this out...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scott Paterson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 18:35:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Surprise! The memory issues are back in Firefox</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/8261/surprise-the-memory-issues-are-back-in-firefox/#comment-3786057</link><description>I hate FF for doing this! But i won't stop using it! Will perhaps shift to Opera for a while!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rampantheart</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 00:24:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Surprise! The memory issues are back in Firefox</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/8261/surprise-the-memory-issues-are-back-in-firefox/#comment-3784188</link><description>Just use opera ;)&lt;br&gt;Losta features, low memory footprint, fast.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 21:15:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Surprise! The memory issues are back in Firefox</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/8261/surprise-the-memory-issues-are-back-in-firefox/#comment-3783525</link><description>Firefox has been created a lot of problems lately.  I am going to stop use it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">I am going to switch</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 20:19:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Surprise! The memory issues are back in Firefox</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/8261/surprise-the-memory-issues-are-back-in-firefox/#comment-3773294</link><description>the memory issues are also terrible on linux.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On windows, I have no problem at all.  It's a shame that a browser that is supposed to be universally cross-platform is not.  Mozilla consistently refuses to do proper development for any platform other than Windows/Intel.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">name</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 12:04:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Surprise! The memory issues are back in Firefox</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/8261/surprise-the-memory-issues-are-back-in-firefox/#comment-3773112</link><description>get a PC!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">calvin</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 11:52:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Surprise! The memory issues are back in Firefox</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/8261/surprise-the-memory-issues-are-back-in-firefox/#comment-3773053</link><description>I am having trouble reaching their add-ons page today. Is the problem on my end or theirs?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">T</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 11:48:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Surprise! The memory issues are back in Firefox</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/8261/surprise-the-memory-issues-are-back-in-firefox/#comment-3771567</link><description>3.0.4 installed for two days , no crashes for me.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Gato</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gato</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 10:36:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Surprise! The memory issues are back in Firefox</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/8261/surprise-the-memory-issues-are-back-in-firefox/#comment-3768174</link><description>Why doesn't it use WebKit? Cause none of you seem to understand that the core of the expansibility of Firefox stems from it using Gecko.&lt;br&gt;I'm using 3.1 beta, and except for the download issue, (which i have solved by using FlashGot and an external tool to download things) I have no complaints.&lt;br&gt;Gecko is fine, it's being slimmed down all the time, and will hopefully live up to expectations with the 2.0 version of the engine.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matjaz</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 04:06:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Surprise! The memory issues are back in Firefox</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/8261/surprise-the-memory-issues-are-back-in-firefox/#comment-3767319</link><description>A quick look a mozilla's bugzilla shows a ton of posts on the issues, ranging from the memory usage (&lt;a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=464648" rel="nofollow"&gt;https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46...&lt;/a&gt;)  to the crashes. Whatever the final issue is, its apparent something is badly broken in the thing.  I personally don't have any issues with the stable build (the nightly build crashed every time I tried to use google docs).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Boredcollegekid</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 01:37:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Surprise! The memory issues are back in Firefox</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/8261/surprise-the-memory-issues-are-back-in-firefox/#comment-3766954</link><description>No kidding. Why does Firefox &lt;strong&gt;NOT&lt;/strong&gt; use WebKit yet? Ego?&lt;br&gt;I've been using the nightly build of FF, which works well, except it crashes EVERY TIME I download a file. Filed a bug report. Meh. I just use Safari to download stuff.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pathawks</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:45:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Surprise! The memory issues are back in Firefox</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/8261/surprise-the-memory-issues-are-back-in-firefox/#comment-3766722</link><description>Still using 2.something here and I don't really have any problems unless I spend a few hours on a flash site.  (Actually not very hard to do thanks to Pandora...)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JohnMcDonald</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:18:02 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>