<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>The Inquisitr - Latest Comments in Should YouTube Ban Violent Videos?</title><link>http://inquisitr.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://inquisitr.disqus.com/should_youtube_ban_violent_videos/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 15:52:18 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Should YouTube Ban Violent Videos?</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/3102/should-youtube-ban-violent-videos/#comment-2306217</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think it's a pretty safe policy change to ban content from terrorists.  That's a pretty small group of folks in the world, and quite honestly, Lieberman's requests were pretty common sensical.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This is something I implored (to great protest from Mashable readers) YouTube to do a long time ago to avoid further stupid and restrictive legislation. I applaud their move to actually enforce an existing terms of service, at least in this area.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark 'Rizzn' Hopkins</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 15:52:18 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>