<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>The Inquisitr - Latest Comments in Scrabulous highlights the failure of American Copyright Law</title><link>http://inquisitr.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:20:30 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Scrabulous highlights the failure of American Copyright Law</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/2010/scrabulous/#comment-5664622</link><description>It is simply stated as, it is. Copyright infringement, They had to know what they were doing when they chose that name. If they had any plan on making any money  from this venture they should have had the foresight to see this out come. I deal with copyrights every day with my illustration work and I cant stress enough on the importance of copyrighted material. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;mark smith &lt;br&gt;&lt;a herf="http://www.able.org/programs/narconon/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Narconon VistaBay&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dalebaker33</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:20:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Scrabulous highlights the failure of American Copyright Law</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/2010/scrabulous/#comment-4863970</link><description>What about the heirs of the copyright holder? Are they involved in corporate greed if they are to receive a benefit for the creative creations of their estate?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You don't seem to understand why patents have a more limited protection life than copyrights.  It boils down to the encouragement of fresh creative works.  If copyrights protections were short-lived, human laziness would ensure that most people resort to benefiting off the backs of others, with no valuable contribution, rather than put the effort to create original works.  In contrast, innovation would be stifled if patents were protected excessively before entering the public domain - because there is much more inherent value for society to allow for derivative works of innovation than the expansion of fair use of copyrights.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Observer</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 03:38:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Scrabulous highlights the failure of American Copyright Law</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/2010/scrabulous/#comment-3588909</link><description>I don't see how Scrabulous and Scrabble can be related. It's a bit off. If they win the case, McDonalds will start suing everybody using the word Mc such as McAfee, Mcdonnel.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">globalrs</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 03:36:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Scrabulous highlights the failure of American Copyright Law</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/2010/scrabulous/#comment-3223806</link><description>If I'm not wrong anything before 1923 is not copyrighted and belong to Public Domain. You can make a lot of money selling public domain stuffs without having to create them.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wapadchange</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 04:20:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Scrabulous highlights the failure of American Copyright Law</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/2010/scrabulous/#comment-1059194</link><description>what a fantastic post Duncan, one of your best yet..</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">agentbleu</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 07:05:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Scrabulous highlights the failure of American Copyright Law</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/2010/scrabulous/#comment-1053707</link><description>I am lost here. Copyright over what? The word scrabble, as any word, is not subject to copyright. Ideas (the idea of the game) are not subject either. At best, it is a case of trademark infringement...&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://electromate.blogspot.com/2008/07/crappy-situation-of-scrapping-of.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://electromate.blogspot.com/2008/07/crappy-...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Feneuk</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:48:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Scrabulous highlights the failure of American Copyright Law</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/2010/scrabulous/#comment-1046585</link><description>not only copyright law is corrupted, the whole notion of intellectual property rights has turned into a protection racket.  they will break upon the rocks of reality one of these days, but not before a million lawyers buy some nice houses.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gregorylent</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 01:40:19 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>