-
Website
http://www.inquisitr.com/ -
Original page
http://www.inquisitr.com/8185/prove-how-uncool-you-are-be-a-microsoft-fan/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
mollyfud
44 comments · 1 points
-
Kyle Brady
186 comments · 13 points
-
ontarioemperor
72 comments · 31 points
-
drewolanoff
34 comments · 55 points
-
StevenHodson
272 comments · 66 points
-
-
Popular Threads
And like Microsoft and am therefore totally web 2.0 uncool.
And yes, I work for Microsoft. So that makes this comment uncool, too.
Google have been hellspawn for a shorter time, but they've learnt some of their best tricks from ex-Apple employees and Redmond refugees. Wise up.
BTW would you like a towel to clean up with after you are finished with your iPhone stroking? Wouldn't want you to stop looking so cool.
And get off of your high horse 'cat' I have been involved in the MS communities as both a developer of VB4/5/6 and .NET .. I have also been involved in their old NNTP newsgroups.
As for respecting other peoples opinions .. well as long as they don;t try and treat me like an idiot I have no problem trying to have intelligent conversations with them. Now if you want to have an adult conversation about this I have no problem but until you pull your self-righteous attitude out of you ass I doubt that will be possible..
When we talk about ms development must remember of some memorable thieving. As I know even the windows as GUI was a stealing. I was laughing when the main feature of explorer7 was tabbed browsing as a big invention. Or see patents licensing FUD http://www.zdnet.com.au/insight/soa/The-FUD-war...
I don't think i'll turn back, beacause software is as love: no reason to pay while sweetest things are free. Even win preinstalled notebook is waste of money - my family will not buy such one. Not hating ms, just getting something better suited for my needs and expectations.
Making money is not a shame. Making money as ms did do and is doing is criminal and $.Ballmer is a marketing nazi. An example http://blog.mandriva.com/2007/10/31/an-open-let...
ms against the world: http://www.groklaw.net/articlebasic.php?story=2...
I don't even know what is the weakest ms thing: the products' quality or the company's image. M$ (sic) isn't evil, is a big bullshit. Use word or excel, maybe xp or vista, but generally is true: isn't cool to be a ms fan.
MS is no different than any other corporation through our human history ... or perhaps you have forgotten the huge breakup of AT&T under the anti-trust laws. And reading an open letter from a Linux organization that is equally guilty of spreading FUD doesn't help the conversation at all.
Take another example (I'm not proud that either egging and corruption happened in my country): http://gizmodo.com/391736/steve-ballmer-egged-i...
version a.) Ballmer was in Budapest to announce Microsoft's leading role and investment a technology skills training program in Hungary, in partnership with the government and other companies.
version b.) Microsoft has midterm contracts with the state in Hungary for "way cheaper than from the store" Campus-licences. This costs billions (in HUF, 160HUF=1USD) for the state and makes students stuck in the Microsoft-world, not knowing Linux etc.
Through our human history no one corporation reched the boiling point: http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?r...
Limiting the hardware capabilities of ultra low-cost PCs: http://www.computerworlduk.com/technology/hardw...
Irregularities on OOXML vote across all Europe: http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=200803...
Sorry, but my opinion is that ms is different from any other big software corporation because instead of developing harder giving better product is using brute force to keep it's marketplace and profit.
Let's turn back to the article author Steve Hodson's statement: "I have a great respect for Microsoft because in the end this is a company that has had an immense impact on our computing lives and to me that is cool."
With all my respect for you, I still think in our days ms has an immense negative impact and that isn't cool to be a ms fan..
Equally, money spent on R&D doesn't equal innovation. By MS own admission a lot of the money in Windows development is spent on ensuring backward compatibility, because that's hugely important to it's customers (in contrast, the only way you'lll run Apple software older than about 5-6 years is under emulation).
The measured difference between the most and least productive programming languages is also about sixfold.
The question is whether MS needs to be cool. IBM are not cool and have never been cool, but know how to work with businesses to make money, whereas cool is, by definition, transient - you're only ever cool until someone else is.
What it does need to do is stop worrying about image and spin and start worrying about products.
PS - as for the Xerox PARC comments someone mentioned - do some research and you'll find Xerox got shares in Apple, so they did benefit from their lab work. In turn, it wasn't the first mouse driven system, only the first windowing system.
Could you please provide one example of Microsoft innovation to support this claim?
http://weblog.infoworld.com/robertxcringely/arc...
That's a good one.
Micro$oft is marching right on past the twits.