The Inquisitr - Latest Comments in Lindsay Lohan Fur Hag: PETA Flour attack

Re: Lindsay Lohan Fur Hag: PETA Flour attack

necroforagoodcause — Sun, 26 Jul 2009 10:07:03 -0000

Why not realise the fact that PETA is an incredibly immature group of mongrels, that if left unchallenged, will grow even bolder and eventually make "animal support" synonymous with "terrorism"? The fact that there are other peaceful organisations out there doesn't change the fact that PETA is fucked up, and SOMETHING needs to be done about that.

Re: Lindsay Lohan Fur Hag: PETA Flour attack

Hannah — Mon, 08 Jun 2009 01:03:12 -0000

If anyone did that to me i would kill them

Re: Lindsay Lohan Fur Hag: PETA Flour attack

Steve — Thu, 27 Nov 2008 13:35:24 -0000

http://www.vegetablekillers.net/forums/ethics/1...

Re: Lindsay Lohan Fur Hag: PETA Flour attack

Steve — Thu, 27 Nov 2008 13:33:47 -0000

People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals provides aid and comfort for the
Earth Liberation Front (ELF) and the Animal Liberation Front (ALF). The two groups are responsible for more than 600 crimes since 1996, causing (by a very conservative FBI estimate) more than $43 million in damage. ALF's
"press office" brags that in 2002, the two groups committed "100 illegal direct actions" -- like blowing up SUVs, destroying the brakes on seafood delivery trucks, and planting firebombs in restaurants.

The FBI calls ALF and ELF the nation's "most serious domestic terrorism threat." Bruce Friedrich, PETA's "vegan campaign director" and third-in-command, didn't seem to care when he addressed the Animal Rights
2001 convention in Virginia, telling a crowd of over 1,000 activists that
"blowing stuff up and smashing windows" is "a great way to bring about animal liberation."

Re: Lindsay Lohan Fur Hag: PETA Flour attack

Steve — Thu, 27 Nov 2008 13:32:04 -0000

http://www.capmag.com/article.asp?ID=3422

Re: Lindsay Lohan Fur Hag: PETA Flour attack

Steve — Thu, 27 Nov 2008 13:31:04 -0000

According to Alex Pacheco, director of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETE), arson, property, destruction, burglary, and theft are "acceptable crimes" when used for the animals' cause.

Re: Lindsay Lohan Fur Hag: PETA Flour attack

Steve — Thu, 27 Nov 2008 13:27:20 -0000

Alex Pacheco is a convicted criminal...what do you expect?

Re: Lindsay Lohan Fur Hag: PETA Flour attack

Steve — Thu, 27 Nov 2008 13:25:48 -0000

Death to Bambi and Thumper and Flipper and Yogi and Rocky and Bullwinkle and.....

Don't wish death on PETA and their robot nobrains...they will freeze while starving.

Re: Lindsay Lohan Fur Hag: PETA Flour attack

Steve — Thu, 27 Nov 2008 13:23:17 -0000

remids me of the mass rallies for hitler you see on the history channel.

Re: Lindsay Lohan Fur Hag: PETA Flour attack

Steve — Thu, 27 Nov 2008 13:22:09 -0000

oops, thats PETA...but you are still a fuckin' itdiot!

Re: Lindsay Lohan Fur Hag: PETA Flour attack

Steve — Thu, 27 Nov 2008 13:21:13 -0000

I am a charter member of PETS: PEOPLE EATING TASTY ANIMALS, so fuck you too idiot.

Re: Lindsay Lohan Fur Hag: PETA Flour attack

Steve — Thu, 27 Nov 2008 13:17:44 -0000

Tell Alex Pacheco that a guy from his days in Athens knows all about him. You people are warped. Animals are food and fur. Lets get back to natural here. If it was good enough for Davy Crockett it is good enough for me. DEATH TO BAMBI! That anal electrocution deal sounds interesting...maybe they could do it tp PETA member. It wouldn't kill them because their brains are in ther butts, but maybe it would stun the stupid out of them.

Re: Lindsay Lohan Fur Hag: PETA Flour attack

Dani — Sat, 22 Nov 2008 18:51:37 -0000

@ CROUCHING WEASEL....I think you are an absolutely DISGUSTING individual and I am horrified that people like you are co-existing on the same planet as me. You are the only person here without a soul. Perhaps you are an atheist as well since you feel that animals are without souls- which disregards the fact that God created all beings humans and non-humans alike. The one who should and will burn in hell is YOU and I am so incredibly thankful for that!!! By the way why don't you remove the word Weasel from your name here? You should call yourself Crouching Lowlife!!!

Re: Lindsay Lohan Fur Hag: PETA Flour attack

Isanne — Wed, 19 Nov 2008 05:53:13 -0000

I agree with you on that.
It just bothers me that you insist on wearing your fur coat just because you can, even with the knowlegde of suffering on fur farms. That's all.

Re: Lindsay Lohan Fur Hag: PETA Flour attack

Chrissy — Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:45:57 -0000

The issue of suffering on fur farms, and the issue of animal activists committing batteries upon citizens in order to express their beliefs, are two separate issues. That suffering may exist on fur farms does not give any animal activist the right to commit batteries on citizens who may or may not disagree with them.

Re: Lindsay Lohan Fur Hag: PETA Flour attack

Chrissy — Tue, 18 Nov 2008 13:46:32 -0000

You can complain and give your opinion indefinitely. But what you say will still not change the fact that the law governs our actions and sets the boundaries for what people can and cannot do. Until PETA can maneuver its way up to the U.S. Supreme Court to change the law in order to dictate what people can and cannot wear, we U.S. citizens are permitted to wear the clothes they want. Until PETA intrudes into our lives to do so, I will continue to wear my fur coat which I bought at a vintage store. And if a PETA activist ever approached me while wearing it to commit a battery upon my body, I will take PETA to court.

Re: Lindsay Lohan Fur Hag: PETA Flour attack

Isanne — Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:41:45 -0000

Hi Valery,
thank you for your post. . I have never been a PETA supporter, there are many other local organisations and they try to make a change by education in the country itself, not by attacking celebreties. I do understand why people get ticked off by actions like these and let's face it, she is only a target because she is a celebrety. I do agree with you that antis only see it their way or the high way so to speak. I support local organisations who educate their own people, since I feel that change will only come from within, It is impossible for me to have the knowledge of fur farms and do nothing.
But can you honestly say that those videos are twisted? What about the live skinning of animals? I am asking this because I am interested in what you have to say as a former insider.

Re: Lindsay Lohan Fur Hag: PETA Flour attack

M.A. Pepper — Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:24:15 -0000

Personally, I am really fed up with people who try to intimidate others because they have different opinions.
This anti-fur thing is like an extreme religion - anything is permissible : attacking someone, or setting a fire, or worse. These eco-terrorits believe ends justify the means.
GET A LIFE - PETA - You are amassing a fortune in donations and doing relatively little to alleviate the suffering of so many domestic animals -

Re: Lindsay Lohan Fur Hag: PETA Flour attack

Valery — Tue, 18 Nov 2008 09:15:22 -0000

Isanne, maybe you should think about it 2 seconds... it's not because PETA and their friends posted a couple of videos that it's a FACT. To tell you the truth, I was a proud PETA supporter until I realized how they would TWIST THE FACTS to get their messages accross.
If you are so educated on the subject, I'm sure you could inform us here about farming standards that are applied under the law in the main countries that have fur farms?? It will make you think twice about your so-called education on the subject. Antis are educated from only one side and are very closed to any other relevent sources. They teach you that. I know it because I was one of them

Re: Lindsay Lohan Fur Hag: PETA Flour attack

Isanne — Tue, 18 Nov 2008 05:21:51 -0000

Chrissy I really do not understand you. Forget PETA. There are many organisations that fight the same cause non violently. PETA does not own the message that there is suffering on fur farms, it is just a fact. Why not educate your self on the subject without all the civil law suits talk or are you afraid that it might be true?

Re: Lindsay Lohan Fur Hag: PETA Flour attack

Isanne — Tue, 18 Nov 2008 05:12:04 -0000

I am not a PETA member or supporter, neither do I support agressiveness towards others. I feel that is it unnecessary these days to wear fur, with so many good alternatives and the information that is available. It is morally not right to wear a coat that was made with so much crualty and suffering. How can you promote this right?
I could not do what you do, to hide behind the US Constitution so you can buy and wear what you want and therefore making an excuse not to educate yourself and make a positive choice.
I don't think PETA actions like these will change a lot, but at least they stir things up, and get the discussion going and maybe a few people will want to understand what all the commotion is about and make a change. People tend to forget very easily when it comes to things they really do not want to know about, like crualty to animals or where the steak on their plate came from.
Have you ever seen images of a fur farm? If you are so keen on wearing a fur coat, no matter where you got it, then I guess you sure wouldn't mind to take a look where it came from either. If after that you are still determined to wear your fur coat, just because of the US Constitution permits you, then I give up. I must conclude that you do not want to be bothered by silly things as animal crualty and just think about yourself and your own constitutional right to buy and wear what ever you want. What about the rights of other living beings, or do you only see the purpose they serve? I do hope that you will at least try to understand and make a change, not because PETA demands it from you, this will never work, but for yourself.

Re: Lindsay Lohan Fur Hag: PETA Flour attack

Chrissy — Mon, 17 Nov 2008 21:53:50 -0000

The smarter idea (than punching, which would land you in jail), is for a large group of us to wear fur coats around PETA activists, so that PETA people throw things at us, and then for us to initiate a class action lawsuit under tort law against PETA. By doing this we change the way PETA protests and force them to protest nonviolently. PETA activists push the envelope way too far.

Re: Lindsay Lohan Fur Hag: PETA Flour attack

IZZY — Mon, 17 Nov 2008 16:00:12 -0000

Just reading the last sentence gives me a good insight of Peta's supporter's way of thinking: "I will do whatever Peta says!!!"
So sad when a generation looses the ability to think by themselves!
Welcome to the Peta-generation!
And the scariest part is that their proud to have a hater group thinking for them!

Re: Lindsay Lohan Fur Hag: PETA Flour attack

Chrissy — Mon, 17 Nov 2008 15:13:57 -0000

There is civil case law already established for the action that PETA took. Any item that a person wears or holds in his or her hand is considered an extension of that person's body. Thus, when another person makes a harmful or offensive touching (like snatching a plate away from a person's hand) or throwing an item onto that person (like PETA's flour), that is considered a intentional harmful or offensive touching in personal injury law (battery). PETA violated Lohan's personal bodily space, and committed a battery.

As for wearing fur coats donated to vintage stores, people have the legal right to buy and wear the clothes they want. There is no language in the U.S. Constitution that states otherwise.

Re: Lindsay Lohan Fur Hag: PETA Flour attack

Hope — Mon, 17 Nov 2008 13:18:49 -0000

Animals lives are worth more then human needs? OK, I know it really feels like you need a fur coat, but you don't, you don't really need one. Assumption is ignorance, but what ever you say. Fur is beautiful, on the animals that grow them and they are not warmer then any other man made material, there have been some amazing advancements in nanotechnology which is producing light weight warm fabrics and making them much more affordable then fur and WARMER then fur. Animals are killed while still conscious, there are plenty of fur producing practices and individuals that are not interested with the humane treatment of these animals as much as they care about the fur that they strip from them and these people still catch, keep and kill animals in inhuman ways. I mean seriously think about what you are saying, it is ridiculous to think that you can speak for the entirety of the fur industry and say that animals are not being killed while conscious, it's just not a true statement , there are still plenty of inhumane practices out there, this is a huge industry that stretches across the world, here there and every where, not just one company where furs are made in the US. Your argument is also flawed in assuming that the suffering upon the animal is limited to death, but it is not limited to death of the animal, the conditions in which they are kept until death 'cause suffering as well. While the wearing of leather is not encouraged by every PETA supporter, I consider it a little better then fur wearing because at least the leather I occasionally wear is limited to leather that come from cows that are already being killed for the meat and not causing countless species of animals to become instinct and endangered which disrupts entire ecosystems. I try to personally off set the impact that cow farming has on the environment by not eating red meat, and in other personal life style choices I have made. Which in my book is much better then just not giving a fuck at all or being a total hypocrite in saying that fur is warmer then any man-made material, which is not true (I am sure you thought it sounded good), or in saying that animals are not conscious when they die, which is also not a fact or true and is a completely ignorant thing to say. So, call me a hypocrite because I wear leather and not fur, it's a personal choice, but I made an educated choice and I support PETA and I know my facts, unlike you. Maybe PETA will see fit to convince me to give up leather, I welcome them to it.