<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>The Inquisitr - Latest Comments in Here&amp;#8217;s a surprise (not): Christian group calls for Google boycott over gay marriage support</title><link>http://inquisitr.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 16:42:07 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Here&amp;#8217;s a surprise (not): Christian group calls for Google boycott over gay marriage support</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/4391/heres-a-surprise-not-christian-group-calls-for-google-boycott-over-gay-marriage-support/#comment-5219580</link><description>How are the relationships different? Do you think gay couples love each other less than straight couples? You may not be bigoted or intolerant, but you are pre-judging and making wrong assumptions.&lt;br&gt;There are extremeists in any religion; some fly planes into buildings, some picket soldiers' funerals, but the majority are normal folk who don't give a second thought to the casual cruelty they promote to anyone different from them when they assume that their version of 'normal' is the only version that counts.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Boy from Oz</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 16:42:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Here&amp;#8217;s a surprise (not): Christian group calls for Google boycott over gay marriage support</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/4391/heres-a-surprise-not-christian-group-calls-for-google-boycott-over-gay-marriage-support/#comment-3552653</link><description>Christians do no feel the way you have portrayed them - with hate signs, etc.  That is NOT a true reflection of a Christian, and it's unfair to portray them as such.&lt;br&gt;Prop. 8 had nothing to do with intolerance or bigotry.  The issue was in redefining the traditional word of "marriage" as we have known it through the centuries to mean....and along with that, the terminology of "husband and wife" in reference to "marriage."  Had the Prop. passed, it would no longer be husband and wife, but partner 1 and partner 2.  People have the freedom to live out their lives as they choose, to be together, to love, and certainly should have the right to get benefits like any other couple - legally, monetarily, etc. etc.  But  wanting a "different " lifestyle than the traditional norm should warrant a "different" terminology for that partnership.  Just don't mix the two lifestyles so that the terminology confuses the relationship as if all relationships are the same - they are NOT.  I'm not bigoted nor intolerant.  I just want to be a wife and have a husband and not have to describe our relationship as partner 1 or 2.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Thankful</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 11:20:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Here&amp;#8217;s a surprise (not): Christian group calls for Google boycott over gay marriage support</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/4391/heres-a-surprise-not-christian-group-calls-for-google-boycott-over-gay-marriage-support/#comment-2801436</link><description>If these people were truly Christian, they would know that God is incapable of hate. Mr. Thomasson should 'Google' that and learn a bit more before making more signs.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">djdigit</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 11:11:37 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>