Community Page
- www.inquisitr.com Jump to website »
-
Subscribe -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
-
Recent Comments
- Not sure where to put my email for coupon.
- Death by chocolate, What a way to go! .lol
- The pictures of people with horse and carts on one side, and on the other someone eating a Whopper. Hey, but that’s ok, because the testing was “done by independent 3rd party testers.” I think I’m...
- You actually are born Jewish or Muslim depending on your parents' affiliations. If your father is Muslim, you are Muslim. If your mother is Jewish, you are Jewish. You may not be a practicing...
- I hope they can treat her for that.
Jump to original thread »
Google, well known for its fence sitting on most political issues, has come out against California Proposition 8, an Act if passed that would see same sex marriage made illegal in California.
In a post to the Google Blog, founder Sergey Brin notes that while Google does not generally take ... Continue reading »
In a post to the Google Blog, founder Sergey Brin notes that while Google does not generally take ... Continue reading »
9 months ago
9 months ago
Bruce Johnson
8 months ago
9 months ago
Men and women are different. And that diversity is important in parenting. Each brings gender-unique and needed approaches to the raising of children. The definition of marriage as between a man and a woman recognizes that important contribution by both genders in the raising of our future generations. Redefining out that essential element of gender will completely change the focus of marriage and the reason for why we promote it.
This isn't about two people showing committed love. This isn't about civil benefits. Both of those can be contained in Domestic Partnerships. There is no need to destroy the foundational purpose of marriage in order to satisfy the feelings of a few who want a stamp of approval for their personal choices.
Prop 8 isn't about "rights". Everyone is either a man or a woman. So they all have the right to participate in "marriage", if they so choose. Some may have no interest in joining into marriage of a man and a woman. And that is their free choice. But it is intolerant of the needs of the rest of society for them to then demand that marriage be redefined for all the rest of us. Changing marriage to include any combination of genders fundamentally changes the institution of marriage.
I have no problem with gay people having domestic partnerships for civil benefits etc, and they can live and do as they want. But as a society we need to promote marriage of a man and a woman, because that institution is critical for the future survival of society. And this issue is important enough that 4 judges ruling by fiat must not be allowed to override the will of the people on defining this most vital foundational institution of society.
Friends, please vote Yes on 8.
8 months ago
Congratulations, the bigots outnumber decent human beings. I hope those of you who voted against Prop 8 are comfortable in knowing that, in 50 years time, you will be mentioned in the same sentence as Governor Wallace of Alabama.
(I'm not surprised you have no idea who that is, bigots are almost always ignorant - maybe you should Google it)
9 months ago
9 months ago
http://www.betsysview.com/2008/09/why-i-oppose-...
9 months ago
http://www.betsysview.com/2008/09/why-i-oppose-...
9 months ago
Your argument is facile. If the institution of marriage in our society were based solely on the rearing of children then partners who were incapable of having children would not be allowed to get married - whether heterosexual or gay.
Also, it is the responsibility of the supreme court to interpret the constitution and the rights enshrined within it.
Nice try to confuse the subject though, and I'm sure if no one bothered to actually think about what you said it would be convincing.
9 months ago
Also, marriage is a civil contract. Churches and faith/religion can easily be removed from the discussion, and they can decide what they will and won't sanction. As a civil act and a contract between two people, it's CLEARLY a violation of equal rights.
9 months ago
9 months ago
8 months ago
8 months ago
8 months ago
8 months ago
8 months ago
8 months ago
8 months ago
Bottom line
People are people - no two the same - yet we are all brother and sisters - No one should be denied rights that others have......