<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>The Inquisitr - Latest Comments in Google Chrome: Should You Convert?</title><link>http://inquisitr.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://inquisitr.disqus.com/google_chrome_should_you_convert/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 13:31:10 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Google Chrome: Should You Convert?</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/2819/google-chrome-should-you-convert/#comment-6876285</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh yeah, and no print button. I know we are in the "Green Age", but I still need to without trouble print things and don't cognate to type or navigate menus.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">christan singles</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 13:31:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Chrome: Should You Convert?</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/2819/google-chrome-should-you-convert/#comment-2033560</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The interesting questions to me are not if Chrome (beta) is ready for prime time (it is not) or which established browser will suffer more (they all will.)  What I find more interesting is that it appears to have all the trappings of a disruptive technology hiding in plain sight.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I wrote more about this idea here:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Google Chrome: Disruptive Technology&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://faseidl.com/public/blog/212172" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://faseidl.com/public/blog/212172"&gt;http://faseidl.com/public/b...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">F. Andy Seidl</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 14:53:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Chrome: Should You Convert?</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/2819/google-chrome-should-you-convert/#comment-2027965</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i would shift if the add-ons move. Thats the only thing keeping me entrenched in Firefox.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.gadodia.net/google-chrome-vs-mozilla-firefox/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://blog.gadodia.net/google-chrome-vs-mozilla-firefox/"&gt;http://blog.gadodia.net/goo...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vaibhbav</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 05:40:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Chrome: Should You Convert?</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/2819/google-chrome-should-you-convert/#comment-2025445</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Uh, you guys do know that the IE8 beta has individual processes for tabs, and all the other same goodness?  There aint much in it that isn't in IE8 at all.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewtobin</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 22:35:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Chrome: Should You Convert?</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/2819/google-chrome-should-you-convert/#comment-2025000</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh yeah, and no print button.  I know we are in the "Green Age", but I still need to easily print things and don't like to type or navigate menus.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Yawn</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 21:51:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Chrome: Should You Convert?</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/2819/google-chrome-should-you-convert/#comment-2024972</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It is an interesting beta, but I wouldn't recommend a switch. I actually prefer IE7 of Firefox.&lt;br&gt;Too many pages that won't display properly, and I was surprised that the Google Toolbar was not included or an option.&lt;br&gt;I immediately disabled sending usage statistics to Google too. I might peek back a few times during the week, but then it will go unused like Firefox and Safari.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Yawn</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 21:48:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Chrome: Should You Convert?</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/2819/google-chrome-should-you-convert/#comment-2023528</link><description>&lt;p&gt;2 things:&lt;br&gt;1) There's no need to be concerned by Chrome's 'beta nature'. As a Google product, it'll be in beta until the end of time.&lt;br&gt;2) There's no need to be concerned about your privacy. Set Chrome to private and turn off cookies, if you want.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">m</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 19:41:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Chrome: Should You Convert?</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/2819/google-chrome-should-you-convert/#comment-2022967</link><description>&lt;p&gt;looking forward to Chrome for efficiency's sake... plus Google tends to roll out really well-tested software, so it shouldn't be half bad in any case&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">patrick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 19:32:21 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>