6 comments

• 

  Eli Gray

  7 months ago

  How would adopting this standard benefit Twitter as a company in the near term? It seems like now is not the right time for them to open up...maybe once they've gone mainstream. Please explain your position.
  reply
• 

  Louis Gray

  7 months ago

  Amusingly, the Outbrain recommendations say:
  
  Twitter Withdraws Plans for Supporting OpenMicroblogging (@louisgray.com: live: Silicon Valley Blog)
  Twitter Planning to Implement OpenMicroblogging Standard (@louisgray.com: live: Silicon Valley Blog)
  
  That would be the beginning and end of the story. Well played, Outbrain!
  reply
• 

  Ken Sheppardson

  7 months ago

  Back on July 20, when Identi.ca and the OMB standard had been live for some 17 days, someone filed Issue 33* on the twitter-api Google Code page, requesting OMB support. Two days later, Alex Payne, API Lead labeled the request "-Type-Defect -Priority-Medium Type-Enhancement Priority-Low" and said:
  
  "Sure, someday, after it sees some adoption.".
  
  He didn't actually mark the issue "Accepted" until Aug 11, when he wrote:
  
  "Changing this to 'Accepted' just so it doesn't jump out at me when I'm scanning for new issues. It's going to be some time before work on this begins, though."
  
  Almost three months later, when this was dug up and spun into "Twitter is planning to support OMB" I tried to point out what most developers who use bug tracking systems already know: Changing an issue's status so that "it doesn't jump out at me when I'm scanning for new issues" is about as far from "planning to support" as you can get. So guess what... now that they've actually thought about it, it's a WontFix.
  
  I suppose it's entertaining to treat comments on bugs and status changes like they were statements by the Fed Chairman made before Congress, but as critical as I've been of Twitter, it's disingenuous to give this so much attention.
  
  * Issue 33: OpenMicroBlogging Support (http://code.google.com/p/twitter-api/issues/det...)
  reply
• 

  brianjesse

  7 months ago

  I thought it interesting that Twitter opted out of Openmicroblogging on the same day that Facebook announced that their logins would work at Twitter. http://is.gd/aaWf
  reply
• 

  wiliam

  7 months ago

  Open Source Developers and users, Break the chains of web 2.0 share cropping. Understand that Twitter is a closed source application.
  
  Twitter the friendly little bird wants to become a closed source monopoly. Twitter wants to lock you and your content into their closed silo and they want to generate millions in revenue off of your content, and for this they will give nothing back to you or your community .
  
  With an Open Source solution you at least have a copy of the application that you have given value. With Open Source you have a choice. If you want to do things differently you are “Free” to take the software and do so. This kind of Freedom also keeps any ideas of vendor/data/content lock in out of the picture.
  
  At adelph.us we believe in members freedom to control their accounts, and their content. We also believe that any revenue model should always put the members in the equation first. We believe in the Open Source community and ideals. We know we are not the smartest guys in the room and trust the our community of members and developers.
  
  Break the chains of the old web 2.0 model. Do not give your content or your software development work to closed source old world companies they only seek to profit from you
  reply
• 

  christan singles

  4 months ago

  Back on July 20, when Identi.ca and the OMB classic had old-fashioned living for some 17 days, someone filed Issue 33* on the twitter-api MSN Code page, requesting OMB support. Two days later, Alex Payne, API Lead labeled the request "-Type-Defect -Priority-Medium cut-Enhancement Priority-Low" and said:
  reply