<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>The Inquisitr - Latest Comments in Dan Lyons Says Kiss My Ass and Quits Blogging</title><link>http://inquisitr.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:19:45 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Dan Lyons Says Kiss My Ass and Quits Blogging</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/8855/dan-lyons-says-kiss-my-ass-and-quits-blogging/#comment-3896904</link><description>Rob Diana has &lt;a href="http://friendfeed.com/e/4ea59d40-2219-e27f-5043-c904072cc99a/Dan-Lyons-Says-Kiss-My-Ass-and-Quits/" rel="nofollow"&gt;asked&lt;/a&gt;, "Will this set a precedent for other people?" While I don't see this affecting generic employee blogging, I do see a possible effect on traditional journalistic companies who engage with more freewheeling - excuse me, "innovative" - types. Perhaps when such an engagement is conceived, the traditional company may state, "We reserve the right to edit you, just like we edit anyone else who works here." If the blogger wants to modify this agreement, he/she may have to negotiate this up front.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ontarioemperor</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:19:45 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>