<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>The Inquisitr - Latest Comments in Could Google be the N.Y. Times salvation?</title><link>http://inquisitr.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://inquisitr.disqus.com/could_google_be_the_ny_times_salvation/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 09:15:05 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Could Google be the N.Y. Times salvation?</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/11859/could-google-be-the-ny-times-salvation/#comment-4386300</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Google doesn't have to buy NY Times. A deal that injects cash in NYT and provides Google with something for Google News may also do the trick. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ppidgeon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 09:15:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Could Google be the N.Y. Times salvation?</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/11859/could-google-be-the-ny-times-salvation/#comment-4385103</link><description>&lt;p&gt;With the costs that the NYT has for authors, Google will very likely not buy the company. and cultural and culinary coverage just doesn't convert performance advertising wise. So I'd lean out of the window and say "nope, not going to happen."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">othylmann</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 04:14:48 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>