<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>The Inquisitr - Latest Comments in Are Independent Studios The Future of Gaming?</title><link>http://inquisitr.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 11:07:27 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Are Independent Studios The Future of Gaming?</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/2493/are-independent-studios-the-future-of-gaming/#comment-1699855</link><description>Entirely agree with you, graphics, 3d and animations are over rated. A game can look amazing and be boring after 5 minutes. We are taking a totally reverse approach with &lt;a href="http://www.erepublik.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.erepublik.com&lt;/a&gt; allowing us to be a lot more creative.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alexis</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 11:07:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are Independent Studios The Future of Gaming?</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/2493/are-independent-studios-the-future-of-gaming/#comment-1686308</link><description>As you point out, independent studios have much greater flexibility in innovating and coming up with new ideas. But while the top-selling titles are the franchises, and with the amount of money needed to develop high-quality (if not high concept) games, the EAs and the Vivendis won't be too worried. But that doesn't mean there isn't a strong market for cult games - which by definition have a limited appeal - and like you I hope that the indies continue to produce new and exciting titles</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">curiouslypersistent</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 08:50:50 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>