<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>The Inquisitr - Latest Comments in A failure to communicate: the closure on TechCrunchIT</title><link>http://inquisitr.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 01:20:27 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: A failure to communicate: the closure on TechCrunchIT</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/2041/a-failure-to-communicate-the-closure-on-techcrunchit/#comment-1083991</link><description>your comments seems to have bought life back. michael seems to be wanting to prove you wrong. back from deadpool</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sidharth</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 01:20:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A failure to communicate: the closure on TechCrunchIT</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/2041/a-failure-to-communicate-the-closure-on-techcrunchit/#comment-1063993</link><description>OMG... I just realized that Outbrain dragged up my post from Louis' blog as "our readers also liked." I hope that doesn't mean I write like FSG!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CyndyA</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:14:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A failure to communicate: the closure on TechCrunchIT</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/2041/a-failure-to-communicate-the-closure-on-techcrunchit/#comment-1063873</link><description>Seems to be active with a recent post   &lt;a href="http://www.techcrunchit.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.techcrunchit.com/&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ccoc</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:01:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A failure to communicate: the closure on TechCrunchIT</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/2041/a-failure-to-communicate-the-closure-on-techcrunchit/#comment-1063152</link><description>~</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">basilberntsen</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:02:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A failure to communicate: the closure on TechCrunchIT</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/2041/a-failure-to-communicate-the-closure-on-techcrunchit/#comment-1062940</link><description>Gillmor just posted today. Ugh.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">danhau</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 13:43:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A failure to communicate: the closure on TechCrunchIT</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/2041/a-failure-to-communicate-the-closure-on-techcrunchit/#comment-1060326</link><description>BTW Joni Mitchell turns 65 this November -- alive and well.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Real SG didn't make errors with the cultural references from his youth, AFAIK...&lt;br&gt;Janis Joplin, maybe?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;More BTW: Live search for inquisitr brings up &lt;a href="http://blogs.inquisitr.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;blogs.inquisitr.com&lt;/a&gt;. On purpose?&lt;br&gt;Planning to let us edit your articles there? :-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stephen Gazoogle</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 09:49:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A failure to communicate: the closure on TechCrunchIT</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/2041/a-failure-to-communicate-the-closure-on-techcrunchit/#comment-1059318</link><description>Stephen, true, but even then its even money that it wouldn't hit either.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">duncanriley</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 07:33:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A failure to communicate: the closure on TechCrunchIT</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/2041/a-failure-to-communicate-the-closure-on-techcrunchit/#comment-1059007</link><description>and...it's back...with the last update on 25 Jul, so it looks like it is dead</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Megan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 06:18:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A failure to communicate: the closure on TechCrunchIT</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/2041/a-failure-to-communicate-the-closure-on-techcrunchit/#comment-1058875</link><description>Will this piece show up on TechMeme?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You should have waited til Sunday. If it didn't show up then, it would be clear proof of bias. Publishing this today gives Gabe an excuse to bury it under Yahoo, Google et al.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stephen Gazoogle</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 05:28:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A failure to communicate: the closure on TechCrunchIT</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/2041/a-failure-to-communicate-the-closure-on-techcrunchit/#comment-1058185</link><description>JK with the Arrington joke. Please don't ban me from gods kingdom</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pathawks</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 01:38:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A failure to communicate: the closure on TechCrunchIT</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/2041/a-failure-to-communicate-the-closure-on-techcrunchit/#comment-1058165</link><description>I sure hope this doesn't mean the other Steve Gilmore (the one who doesn't make any sense) will start posting on TechCrunch again.&lt;br&gt;I mean, don't those people have any standards? (I guess they let Mike post too, but only because he signs the checks).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pathawks</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 01:33:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A failure to communicate: the closure on TechCrunchIT</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/2041/a-failure-to-communicate-the-closure-on-techcrunchit/#comment-1057494</link><description>Well that was short lived.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ben</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 23:13:01 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>